Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2 | #3 of 2287.8 score | UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #15 of 36$0.085 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0 | #2 of 2268.1 score | UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,491.10100% of row best · rating · gemini-3.7-flash-high; 95% CI [1482.94370265, 1499.25525622]; votes 5685; rank 6 | 1,287.1386% of row best · rating · llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct; 95% CI [1282.87677682, 1291.39199009]; votes 39349; rank 243 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark winOverall lead | 0 benchmark wins |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Meta |
| Family | Gemini 3 | Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e Instruct |
| Model | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct |
| Version | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2025-04-05 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 401.6B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 17B |
| License | Unknown | other |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, tools |
13 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Gemini 3.7 Flash Capabilities
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
 DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct FAQs
Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.7 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+
Gemini 3.7 Flash is $0.75 and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is $0.20 per million tokens, so Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 3.7 Flash is $3.75 and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is $0.696 per million tokens, so Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+
Gemini 3.7 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 3.7 Flash supports 1,049K and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Gemini 3.7 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct be self-hosted?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemini 3.7 Flash is not marked open weight; Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is open weight.
Can Gemini 3.7 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct understand images?+
Gemini 3.7 Flash is documented with image input; Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 3.7 Flash is 66K and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is —.
Do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemini 3.7 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+
Gemini 3.7 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has 1, so Gemini 3.7 Flash has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.