Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3
At a Glance
| Compare | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | Muse Spark 1.3Meta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.25Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $10.00Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | Not reported |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 4, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,421.2397% of row best · rating · gemini-2.5-pro; 95% CI [1414.98072895, 1427.48825137]; votes 25110; rank 36 | 1,470.66100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.3-max; 95% CI [1452.36505006, 1488.94793707]; votes 1006; rank 15 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,457.7798% of row best · rating · gemini-2.5-pro; 95% CI [1455.30542635, 1460.23799206]; votes 122554; rank 36 | 1,489.74100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.3-max; 95% CI [1480.91456937, 1498.56660928]; votes 4723; rank 10 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,262.1796% of row best · rating · gemini-2.5-pro; 95% CI [1257.50456844, 1266.82595195]; votes 87635; rank 45 | 1,314.56100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.3-max; 95% CI [1299.74034111, 1329.38210317]; votes 1804; rank 8 |
| ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified | 78.2795% of row best · points · Gemini 2.5 Pro · 4,521 output tokens / case | 82.63100% of row best · points · Muse Spark 1.3 (thinking) · 6,301 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 3 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Meta |
| Family | Gemini 2 5 | Muse Spark |
| Model | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Version | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-09-02 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document | Text, Image, Video |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | Unknown |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, tools |
Gemini 2.5 Pro Capabilities
Muse Spark 1.3 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3 FAQs
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.3 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 2.5 Pro and Muse Spark 1.3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.3?+
Only Gemini 2.5 Pro has a directly sourced input price: $1.25 per million tokens. Only Gemini 2.5 Pro has a directly sourced output price: $10.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.3?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Gemini 2.5 Pro is 1,049K and Muse Spark 1.3 is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.3?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.3 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 2.5 Pro is not marked open weight; Muse Spark 1.3 is not marked open weight.
Can Gemini 2.5 Pro and Muse Spark 1.3 understand images?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro is documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.3?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 2.5 Pro is 66K and Muse Spark 1.3 is —.
Do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Muse Spark 1.3 support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Muse Spark 1.3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.3?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro has 2 sourced provider routes; Muse Spark 1.3 has 0, so Gemini 2.5 Pro has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.3?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.