Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok Build 0.1
At a Glance
| Compare |  Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #1 of 44$0.0020 per LiveBench case |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.25Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $1.00Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $10.00Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $2.00Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 256K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | xAI |
| Family | Gemini 2 5 | Grok Build |
| Model | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Version | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-05-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 256K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Gemini 2.5 Pro Capabilities
Grok Build 0.1 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok Build 0.1 FAQs
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 2.5 Pro and Grok Build 0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro is $1.25 and Grok Build 0.1 is $1.00 per million tokens, so Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 2.5 Pro is $10.00 and Grok Build 0.1 is $2.00 per million tokens, so Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1,049K and Grok Build 0.1 supports 256K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Gemini 2.5 Pro or Grok Build 0.1 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 2.5 Pro is not marked open weight; Grok Build 0.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Gemini 2.5 Pro and Grok Build 0.1 understand images?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro is documented with image input; Grok Build 0.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 2.5 Pro is 66K and Grok Build 0.1 is —.
Do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Grok Build 0.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok Build 0.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro has 2 sourced provider routes; Grok Build 0.1 has 1, so Gemini 2.5 Pro has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.