Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
At a Glance
| Compare |  Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.30Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $0.16Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $2.50Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $0.65Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 131K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Granite 4.2 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,417.27100% of row best · rating · gemini-2.5-flash; 95% CI [1414.83704531, 1419.70406968]; votes 122732; rank 116 | 1,363.2896% of row best · rating · granite-4.2-30b; 95% CI [1352.63422000, 1373.93564272]; votes 3255; rank 181 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Granite 4.2 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | IBM |
| Family | Gemini 2 5 | Granite 4 2 |
| Model | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Granite 4.2 30B |
| Version | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Granite 4.2 30B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-08-25 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 131K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 29.3B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Gemini 2.5 Flash Capabilities
Granite 4.2 30B Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B FAQs
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or Granite 4.2 30B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 2.5 Flash and Granite 4.2 30B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Granite 4.2 30B?+
Gemini 2.5 Flash is $0.30 and Granite 4.2 30B is $0.16 per million tokens, so Granite 4.2 30B is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $2.50 and Granite 4.2 30B is $0.65 per million tokens, so Granite 4.2 30B is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Granite 4.2 30B?+
Gemini 2.5 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1,049K and Granite 4.2 30B supports 131K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Granite 4.2 30B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Gemini 2.5 Flash or Granite 4.2 30B be self-hosted?+
Granite 4.2 30B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemini 2.5 Flash is not marked open weight; Granite 4.2 30B is open weight.
Can Gemini 2.5 Flash and Granite 4.2 30B understand images?+
Gemini 2.5 Flash is documented with image input; Granite 4.2 30B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Granite 4.2 30B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 2.5 Flash is 66K and Granite 4.2 30B is —.
Do Gemini 2.5 Flash and Granite 4.2 30B support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemini 2.5 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Granite 4.2 30B: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Granite 4.2 30B?+
Gemini 2.5 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; Granite 4.2 30B has 1, so Gemini 2.5 Flash has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Granite 4.2 30B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.