Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Inkling

At a Glance

Compare
Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle DeepMind
InklingThinking Machines Lab
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#34 of 4645.4 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#18 of 44$0.090 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#28 of 3848.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.10Google AI · Aug 29, 2026$0.95Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.40Google AI · Aug 29, 2026$4.05Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteInkling
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified68.7687% of row best · points · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite · 2,360 output tokens / case79.41100% of row best · points · Inkling · 5,785 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteInkling
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindThinking Machines Lab
FamilyGemini 2 5Inkling
ModelGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteInkling
VersionGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteInkling
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2026-07-15
Knowledge cutoff2025-01-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, Audio, DocumentText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,049K
Total parametersUnknown975B
Active parametersUnknown41B
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools, vision

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-2.5-flash-lite

Inkling Capabilities

agentschatcodinggenerationreasoningtoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDthinkingmachines/Inkling

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Inkling FAQs

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Inkling better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Inkling, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Inkling?+

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is $0.10 and Inkling is $0.95 per million tokens, so Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is $0.40 and Inkling is $4.05 per million tokens, so Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Inkling?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is 1,049K and Inkling is 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Inkling?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Inkling be self-hosted?+

Inkling is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is not marked open weight; Inkling is open weight.

Can Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Inkling understand images?+

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is documented with image input; Inkling is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Inkling?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is 66K and Inkling is —.

Do Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Inkling support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Inkling: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Inkling?+

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has 2 sourced provider routes; Inkling has 4, so Inkling has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Inkling?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback