Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Hy3

At a Glance

Compare
Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle DeepMind
Hy3Tencent
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.10Google AI · Aug 29, 2026$0.13Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.40Google AI · Aug 29, 2026$0.528Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K262K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHy3
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindTencent
FamilyGemini 2 5Hy3
ModelGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHy3
VersionGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHy3
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknownUnknown
Knowledge cutoff2025-01-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, Audio, DocumentText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K262K
Total parametersUnknown298.8B
Active parametersUnknown21B
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, tools

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-2.5-flash-lite

Hy3 Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDtencent/Hy3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Hy3 FAQs

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Hy3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Hy3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Hy3?+

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is $0.10 and Hy3 is $0.13 per million tokens, so Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is $0.40 and Hy3 is $0.528 per million tokens, so Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Hy3?+

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite supports 1,049K and Hy3 supports 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Hy3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Hy3 be self-hosted?+

Hy3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is not marked open weight; Hy3 is open weight.

Can Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Hy3 understand images?+

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is documented with image input; Hy3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Hy3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is 66K and Hy3 is —.

Do Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Hy3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Hy3: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Hy3?+

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has 2 sourced provider routes; Hy3 has 3, so Hy3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Hy3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback