FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 vs Grok Build 0.1
At a Glance
| Compare | FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8Black Forest Labs | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #1 of 44$0.0020 per LiveBench case |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $1.00Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $2.00Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | Not reported | 256K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | FLUX.2-klein-4b-fp8 | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Black Forest Labs | xAI |
| Family | Flux 2 Klein 4b Fp8 | Grok Build |
| Model | FLUX.2-klein-4b-fp8 | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Version | FLUX.2-klein-4b-fp8 | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2026-01-15 | 2026-05-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Image | Text |
| Context window | Unknown | 256K |
| Total parameters | 4B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Unknown | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Unknown | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | generation | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 Capabilities
Grok Build 0.1 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 vs Grok Build 0.1 FAQs
Is FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 and Grok Build 0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 or Grok Build 0.1?+
Only Grok Build 0.1 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only Grok Build 0.1 has a directly sourced output price: $2.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 or Grok Build 0.1?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 is — and Grok Build 0.1 is 256K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 or Grok Build 0.1 be self-hosted?+
FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 is open weight; Grok Build 0.1 is not marked open weight.
Can FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 and Grok Build 0.1 understand images?+
FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 is documented with image input; Grok Build 0.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 or Grok Build 0.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 is — and Grok Build 0.1 is —.
Do FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 and Grok Build 0.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8: image input. Grok Build 0.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 or Grok Build 0.1?+
FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 has 0 sourced provider routes; Grok Build 0.1 has 1, so Grok Build 0.1 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, FLUX.2 klein 4B FP8 or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.