ERNIE X1.1 vs Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens66K131K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldERNIE X1.1Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
DeveloperBaiduMicrosoft
FamilyErnie X1Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct
ModelERNIE X1.1Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
VersionERNIE X1.1Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-09-262025-02-26
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window66K131K
Total parametersUnknown5.6B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownmit
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessBaidu Qianfan (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitiesagents, chat, reasoning, search, toolschat, generation

ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities

agentschatreasoningsearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbaidu/ernie-x1.1

Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct Capabilities

chatgeneration
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmicrosoft/Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

ERNIE X1.1 vs Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct FAQs

Is ERNIE X1.1 or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE X1.1 and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, ERNIE X1.1 or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced output price: $4.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, ERNIE X1.1 or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct supports 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE X1.1 or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can ERNIE X1.1 or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct be self-hosted?+

Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight; Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct is open weight.

Can ERNIE X1.1 and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct understand images?+

ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input; Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE X1.1 or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE X1.1 is 66K and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct is —.

Do ERNIE X1.1 and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct support reasoning and tool use?+

ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE X1.1 or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

ERNIE X1.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct has 0, so ERNIE X1.1 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, ERNIE X1.1 or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback