ERNIE X1.1 vs phi-4

At a Glance

Compare
phi-4Microsoft
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.070Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.14Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens66K16K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldERNIE X1.1phi-4
DeveloperBaiduMicrosoft
FamilyErnie X1Phi 4
ModelERNIE X1.1phi-4
VersionERNIE X1.1phi-4
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-09-262024-12-12
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window66K16K
Total parametersUnknown14.7B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownmit
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessBaidu Qianfan (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, reasoning, search, toolschat, generation

ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities

agentschatreasoningsearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbaidu/ernie-x1.1

phi-4 Capabilities

chatgeneration
Serving providers3
Canonical IDmicrosoft/phi-4

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

ERNIE X1.1 vs phi-4 FAQs

Is ERNIE X1.1 or phi-4 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE X1.1 and phi-4, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, ERNIE X1.1 or phi-4?+

ERNIE X1.1 is $1.00 and phi-4 is $0.070 per million tokens, so phi-4 is cheaper on this metric. ERNIE X1.1 is $4.00 and phi-4 is $0.14 per million tokens, so phi-4 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, ERNIE X1.1 or phi-4?+

ERNIE X1.1 has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K and phi-4 supports 16K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE X1.1 or phi-4?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can ERNIE X1.1 or phi-4 be self-hosted?+

phi-4 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight; phi-4 is open weight.

Can ERNIE X1.1 and phi-4 understand images?+

ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input; phi-4 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE X1.1 or phi-4?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE X1.1 is 66K and phi-4 is —.

Do ERNIE X1.1 and phi-4 support reasoning and tool use?+

ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. phi-4: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE X1.1 or phi-4?+

ERNIE X1.1 has 1 sourced provider route; phi-4 has 3, so phi-4 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, ERNIE X1.1 or phi-4?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback