ERNIE X1.1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE X1.1 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced output price: $4.00 per million tokens.

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 supports 262K.

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 is open weight.

ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 has the larger sourced maximum output: ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 supports 131K output tokens.

ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

ERNIE X1.1 has 1 sourced provider route; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 has 0, so ERNIE X1.1 has broader tracked availability.

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.