ERNIE X1.1 vs Mistral Small 4 119B 2603
At a Glance
| Compare | ERNIE X1.1Baidu | Mistral Small 4 119B 2603Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.15Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.60Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 66K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | ERNIE X1.1 | Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Baidu | Mistral AI |
| Family | Ernie X1 | Mistral Small 4 119b 2603 |
| Model | ERNIE X1.1 | Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603 |
| Version | ERNIE X1.1 | Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-09-26 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 66K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 119.4B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 6.5B |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Baidu Qianfan (Standard) | Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, reasoning, search, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities
Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
ERNIE X1.1 vs Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 FAQs
Is ERNIE X1.1 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE X1.1 and Mistral Small 4 119B 2603, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, ERNIE X1.1 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+
ERNIE X1.1 is $1.00 and Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 is $0.15 per million tokens, so Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 is cheaper on this metric. ERNIE X1.1 is $4.00 and Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 is $0.60 per million tokens, so Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, ERNIE X1.1 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+
Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K and Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE X1.1 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can ERNIE X1.1 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 be self-hosted?+
Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight; Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 is open weight.
Can ERNIE X1.1 and Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 understand images?+
ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input; Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE X1.1 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE X1.1 is 66K and Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 is —.
Do ERNIE X1.1 and Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 support reasoning and tool use?+
ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. Mistral Small 4 119B 2603: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE X1.1 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+
ERNIE X1.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 has 1, a tie.
Which offers better value, ERNIE X1.1 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.