ERNIE X1.1 vs OCR 4.1

At a Glance

Compare
OCR 4.1Mistral AI
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens66KNot reported
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldERNIE X1.1OCR 4.1
DeveloperBaiduMistral AI
FamilyErnie X1Mistral OCR
ModelERNIE X1.1OCR 4.1
VersionERNIE X1.1OCR 4.1
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-09-262026-07-16
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextImage, Document
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window66KUnknown
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessBaidu Qianfan (Standard)Mistral AI (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, reasoning, search, toolsbounding-box-extraction, document-ai, ocr, structured-annotations

ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities

agentschatreasoningsearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbaidu/ernie-x1.1

OCR 4.1 Capabilities

bounding-box-extractiondocument-aiocrstructured-annotations
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmistralai/mistral-ocr-4-1

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

ERNIE X1.1 vs OCR 4.1 FAQs

Is ERNIE X1.1 or OCR 4.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE X1.1 and OCR 4.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, ERNIE X1.1 or OCR 4.1?+

Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced output price: $4.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, ERNIE X1.1 or OCR 4.1?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. ERNIE X1.1 is 66K and OCR 4.1 is —.

Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE X1.1 or OCR 4.1?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can ERNIE X1.1 or OCR 4.1 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight; OCR 4.1 is not marked open weight.

Can ERNIE X1.1 and OCR 4.1 understand images?+

ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input; OCR 4.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE X1.1 or OCR 4.1?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE X1.1 is 66K and OCR 4.1 is —.

Do ERNIE X1.1 and OCR 4.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. OCR 4.1: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE X1.1 or OCR 4.1?+

ERNIE X1.1 has 1 sourced provider route; OCR 4.1 has 1, a tie.

Which offers better value, ERNIE X1.1 or OCR 4.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback