ERNIE X1.1 vs Lyria 3.5

At a Glance

Compare
Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens66K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Sep 22, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldERNIE X1.1Lyria 3.5
DeveloperBaiduGoogle DeepMind
FamilyErnie X1Lyria
ModelERNIE X1.1Lyria 3.5
VersionERNIE X1.1Lyria 3.5
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-09-262026-07-29
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText, Audio
Context window66K1,049K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessBaidu Qianfan (Standard)Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, reasoning, search, toolsgeneration, image-to-music, lyrics, music-generation, synthid, vocals

ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities

agentschatreasoningsearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbaidu/ernie-x1.1

Lyria 3.5 Capabilities

generationimage-to-musiclyricsmusic-generationsynthidvocals
Serving providers2
Canonical IDlyria-3.5

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

ERNIE X1.1 vs Lyria 3.5 FAQs

Is ERNIE X1.1 or Lyria 3.5 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE X1.1 and Lyria 3.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, ERNIE X1.1 or Lyria 3.5?+

Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced output price: $4.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, ERNIE X1.1 or Lyria 3.5?+

Lyria 3.5 has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K and Lyria 3.5 supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE X1.1 or Lyria 3.5?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can ERNIE X1.1 or Lyria 3.5 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight; Lyria 3.5 is not marked open weight.

Can ERNIE X1.1 and Lyria 3.5 understand images?+

ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input; Lyria 3.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE X1.1 or Lyria 3.5?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE X1.1 is 66K and Lyria 3.5 is 66K.

Do ERNIE X1.1 and Lyria 3.5 support reasoning and tool use?+

ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. Lyria 3.5: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE X1.1 or Lyria 3.5?+

ERNIE X1.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Lyria 3.5 has 2, so Lyria 3.5 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, ERNIE X1.1 or Lyria 3.5?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback