ERNIE X1.1 vs Hy3

At a Glance

Compare
Hy3Tencent
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort#25 of 5750.1 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 16.7–83.4
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.13Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 1, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.528Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens66K262K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldERNIE X1.1Hy3
DeveloperBaiduTencent
FamilyErnie X1Hy3
ModelERNIE X1.1Hy3
VersionERNIE X1.1Hy3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-09-26Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window66K262K
Total parametersUnknown298.8B
Active parametersUnknown21B
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessBaidu Qianfan (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, reasoning, search, toolschat, generation, tools

ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities

agentschatreasoningsearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbaidu/ernie-x1.1

Hy3 Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDtencent/Hy3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

ERNIE X1.1 vs Hy3 FAQs

Is ERNIE X1.1 or Hy3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE X1.1 and Hy3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, ERNIE X1.1 or Hy3?+

ERNIE X1.1 is $1.00 and Hy3 is $0.13 per million tokens, so Hy3 is cheaper on this metric. ERNIE X1.1 is $4.00 and Hy3 is $0.528 per million tokens, so Hy3 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, ERNIE X1.1 or Hy3?+

Hy3 has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE X1.1 supports 65,536 tokens and Hy3 supports 262,144 tokens.

Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE X1.1 or Hy3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can ERNIE X1.1 or Hy3 be self-hosted?+

Hy3 is documented as self-hostable; ERNIE X1.1 is documented as not self-hostable. ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight; Hy3 is open weight.

Can ERNIE X1.1 and Hy3 understand images?+

ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input; Hy3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE X1.1 or Hy3?+

ERNIE X1.1 has a sourced maximum output of 65,536 tokens; Hy3's maximum output is not reported. A larger limit cannot be determined.

Do ERNIE X1.1 and Hy3 support reasoning and tool use?+

ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. Hy3: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE X1.1 or Hy3?+

ERNIE X1.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Hy3 has 3, so Hy3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, ERNIE X1.1 or Hy3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback