ERNIE X1.1 vs Hy3
At a Glance
| Compare | ERNIE X1.1Baidu | Hy3Tencent |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4 | UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort | #25 of 5750.1 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 16.7–83.4 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.13Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 1, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.528Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 66K | 262K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | ERNIE X1.1 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Baidu | Tencent |
| Family | Ernie X1 | Hy3 |
| Model | ERNIE X1.1 | Hy3 |
| Version | ERNIE X1.1 | Hy3 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-09-26 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 66K | 262K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 298.8B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 21B |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Baidu Qianfan (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, reasoning, search, tools | chat, generation, tools |
ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities
Hy3 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
ERNIE X1.1 vs Hy3 FAQs
Is ERNIE X1.1 or Hy3 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE X1.1 and Hy3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, ERNIE X1.1 or Hy3?+
ERNIE X1.1 is $1.00 and Hy3 is $0.13 per million tokens, so Hy3 is cheaper on this metric. ERNIE X1.1 is $4.00 and Hy3 is $0.528 per million tokens, so Hy3 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, ERNIE X1.1 or Hy3?+
Hy3 has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE X1.1 supports 65,536 tokens and Hy3 supports 262,144 tokens.
Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE X1.1 or Hy3?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can ERNIE X1.1 or Hy3 be self-hosted?+
Hy3 is documented as self-hostable; ERNIE X1.1 is documented as not self-hostable. ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight; Hy3 is open weight.
Can ERNIE X1.1 and Hy3 understand images?+
ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input; Hy3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE X1.1 or Hy3?+
ERNIE X1.1 has a sourced maximum output of 65,536 tokens; Hy3's maximum output is not reported. A larger limit cannot be determined.
Do ERNIE X1.1 and Hy3 support reasoning and tool use?+
ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. Hy3: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE X1.1 or Hy3?+
ERNIE X1.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Hy3 has 3, so Hy3 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, ERNIE X1.1 or Hy3?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.