ERNIE X1.1 vs Granite Vision 4.1 4B

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens66K131K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldERNIE X1.1granite-vision-4.1-4b
DeveloperBaiduIBM
FamilyErnie X1Granite Vision 4 1 4b
ModelERNIE X1.1granite-vision-4.1-4b
VersionERNIE X1.1granite-vision-4.1-4b
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-09-262026-04-29
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window66K131K
Total parametersUnknown4B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessBaidu Qianfan (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitiesagents, chat, reasoning, search, toolschat, generation, tools

ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities

agentschatreasoningsearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbaidu/ernie-x1.1

Granite Vision 4.1 4B Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-vision-4.1-4b

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

ERNIE X1.1 vs Granite Vision 4.1 4B FAQs

Is ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Vision 4.1 4B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE X1.1 and Granite Vision 4.1 4B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Vision 4.1 4B?+

Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced output price: $4.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Vision 4.1 4B?+

Granite Vision 4.1 4B has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K and Granite Vision 4.1 4B supports 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Vision 4.1 4B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Vision 4.1 4B be self-hosted?+

Granite Vision 4.1 4B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight; Granite Vision 4.1 4B is open weight.

Can ERNIE X1.1 and Granite Vision 4.1 4B understand images?+

ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input; Granite Vision 4.1 4B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Vision 4.1 4B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE X1.1 is 66K and Granite Vision 4.1 4B is —.

Do ERNIE X1.1 and Granite Vision 4.1 4B support reasoning and tool use?+

ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. Granite Vision 4.1 4B: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Vision 4.1 4B?+

ERNIE X1.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Granite Vision 4.1 4B has 0, so ERNIE X1.1 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Vision 4.1 4B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback