ERNIE X1.1 vs Granite Embedding 30m English
At a Glance
| Compare | ERNIE X1.1Baidu | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 66K | 1K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | ERNIE X1.1 | granite-embedding-30m-english |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Baidu | IBM |
| Family | Ernie X1 | Granite Embedding 30m English |
| Model | ERNIE X1.1 | granite-embedding-30m-english |
| Version | ERNIE X1.1 | granite-embedding-30m-english |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-09-26 | 2025-08-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Embedding |
| Context window | 66K | 1K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 30.3M |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Baidu Qianfan (Standard) | Hugging Face (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, reasoning, search, tools | embeddings |
ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities
Granite Embedding 30m English Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
ERNIE X1.1 vs Granite Embedding 30m English FAQs
Is ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Embedding 30m English better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE X1.1 and Granite Embedding 30m English, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+
Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced output price: $4.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+
ERNIE X1.1 has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K and Granite Embedding 30m English supports 1K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Embedding 30m English be self-hosted?+
Granite Embedding 30m English is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight; Granite Embedding 30m English is open weight.
Can ERNIE X1.1 and Granite Embedding 30m English understand images?+
ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input; Granite Embedding 30m English is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE X1.1 is 66K and Granite Embedding 30m English is —.
Do ERNIE X1.1 and Granite Embedding 30m English support reasoning and tool use?+
ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. Granite Embedding 30m English: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+
ERNIE X1.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Granite Embedding 30m English has 1, a tie.
Which offers better value, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.