ERNIE X1.1 vs Granite Embedding 30m English

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens66K1K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Different Model RolesThese models do not share a sourced market category. Their primary-source facts remain comparable below, while performance claims require matched evidence.

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldERNIE X1.1granite-embedding-30m-english
DeveloperBaiduIBM
FamilyErnie X1Granite Embedding 30m English
ModelERNIE X1.1granite-embedding-30m-english
VersionERNIE X1.1granite-embedding-30m-english
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-09-262025-08-29
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextEmbedding
Context window66K1K
Total parametersUnknown30.3M
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessBaidu Qianfan (Standard)Hugging Face (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, reasoning, search, toolsembeddings

ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities

agentschatreasoningsearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbaidu/ernie-x1.1

Granite Embedding 30m English Capabilities

embeddings
Serving providers1
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-embedding-30m-english

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

ERNIE X1.1 vs Granite Embedding 30m English FAQs

Is ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Embedding 30m English better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE X1.1 and Granite Embedding 30m English, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+

Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced output price: $4.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+

ERNIE X1.1 has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K and Granite Embedding 30m English supports 1K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Embedding 30m English be self-hosted?+

Granite Embedding 30m English is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight; Granite Embedding 30m English is open weight.

Can ERNIE X1.1 and Granite Embedding 30m English understand images?+

ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input; Granite Embedding 30m English is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE X1.1 is 66K and Granite Embedding 30m English is —.

Do ERNIE X1.1 and Granite Embedding 30m English support reasoning and tool use?+

ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. Granite Embedding 30m English: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+

ERNIE X1.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Granite Embedding 30m English has 1, a tie.

Which offers better value, ERNIE X1.1 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback