ERNIE X1.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
At a Glance
| Compare |  ERNIE X1.1Baidu |  Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle DeepMind |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.10Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.40Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 66K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | ERNIE X1.1 | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Baidu | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Ernie X1 | Gemini 2 5 |
| Model | ERNIE X1.1 | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
| Version | ERNIE X1.1 | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-09-26 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2025-01-01 |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 66K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Baidu Qianfan (Standard) | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, reasoning, search, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | ERNIE X1.1Baidu | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | ERNIE X1.1Baidu | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
ERNIE X1.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite FAQs
Is ERNIE X1.1 or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE X1.1 and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, ERNIE X1.1 or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?+
ERNIE X1.1 is $1.00 and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is $0.10 per million tokens, so Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is cheaper on this metric. ERNIE X1.1 is $4.00 and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is $0.40 per million tokens, so Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, ERNIE X1.1 or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE X1.1 or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can ERNIE X1.1 or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is not marked open weight.
Can ERNIE X1.1 and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite understand images?+
ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE X1.1 or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE X1.1 is 66K and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is 66K.
Do ERNIE X1.1 and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite support reasoning and tool use?+
ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE X1.1 or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?+
ERNIE X1.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has 2, so Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, ERNIE X1.1 or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.