ERNIE X1.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
At a Glance
| Compare |  ERNIE X1.1Baidu |  DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort | #20 of 4665.0 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #20 of 44$0.094 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort | #14 of 3857.4 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $1.30Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $2.60Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 66K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | ERNIE X1.1 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Baidu | DeepSeek |
| Family | Ernie X1 | Deepseek V4 Pro |
| Model | ERNIE X1.1 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
| Version | ERNIE X1.1 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-09-26 | 2026-08-13 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 66K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 1.6T |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 49B |
| License | Unknown | mit |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Baidu Qianfan (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, reasoning, search, tools | agents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools |
ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | ERNIE X1.1Baidu | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs | DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | ERNIE X1.1Baidu | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
ERNIE X1.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 FAQs
Is ERNIE X1.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE X1.1 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, ERNIE X1.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
ERNIE X1.1 is $1.00 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $1.30 per million tokens, so ERNIE X1.1 is cheaper on this metric. ERNIE X1.1 is $4.00 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $2.60 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, ERNIE X1.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE X1.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can ERNIE X1.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 be self-hosted?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open weight.
Can ERNIE X1.1 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 understand images?+
ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE X1.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE X1.1 is 66K and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is —.
Do ERNIE X1.1 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 support reasoning and tool use?+
ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE X1.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
ERNIE X1.1 has 1 sourced provider route; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has 3, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, ERNIE X1.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.