ERNIE X1.1 vs DeepSeek V3.2

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.26Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.38Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens66K164K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldERNIE X1.1DeepSeek-V3.2
DeveloperBaiduDeepSeek
FamilyErnie X1Deepseek V3 2
ModelERNIE X1.1DeepSeek-V3.2
VersionERNIE X1.1DeepSeek-V3.2
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-09-262025-12-01
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window66K164K
Total parametersUnknown685.4B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownmit
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessBaidu Qianfan (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, reasoning, search, toolschat, generation, reasoning

ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities

agentschatreasoningsearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbaidu/ernie-x1.1

DeepSeek V3.2 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.2

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

ERNIE X1.1 vs DeepSeek V3.2 FAQs

Is ERNIE X1.1 or DeepSeek V3.2 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE X1.1 and DeepSeek V3.2, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, ERNIE X1.1 or DeepSeek V3.2?+

ERNIE X1.1 is $1.00 and DeepSeek V3.2 is $0.26 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V3.2 is cheaper on this metric. ERNIE X1.1 is $4.00 and DeepSeek V3.2 is $0.38 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V3.2 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, ERNIE X1.1 or DeepSeek V3.2?+

DeepSeek V3.2 has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K and DeepSeek V3.2 supports 164K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE X1.1 or DeepSeek V3.2?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can ERNIE X1.1 or DeepSeek V3.2 be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V3.2 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight; DeepSeek V3.2 is open weight.

Can ERNIE X1.1 and DeepSeek V3.2 understand images?+

ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input; DeepSeek V3.2 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE X1.1 or DeepSeek V3.2?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE X1.1 is 66K and DeepSeek V3.2 is —.

Do ERNIE X1.1 and DeepSeek V3.2 support reasoning and tool use?+

ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. DeepSeek V3.2: reasoning. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE X1.1 or DeepSeek V3.2?+

ERNIE X1.1 has 1 sourced provider route; DeepSeek V3.2 has 3, so DeepSeek V3.2 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, ERNIE X1.1 or DeepSeek V3.2?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback