ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.195Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.975Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTQwen3 Coder Flash
DeveloperBaiduQwen
FamilyErnie 4 5 0 3b PtQwen3 Coder
ModelERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTQwen3 Coder Flash
VersionERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTQwen3 Coder Flash
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2025-07-28
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K1,000K
Total parameters360.7MUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownAlibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generationagents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT Capabilities

chatgeneration
Serving providers0
Canonical IDbaidu/ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT

Qwen3 Coder Flash Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3-coder-flash

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT vs Qwen3 Coder Flash FAQs

Is ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Qwen3 Coder Flash better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT and Qwen3 Coder Flash, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Qwen3 Coder Flash?+

Only Qwen3 Coder Flash has a directly sourced input price: $0.195 per million tokens. Only Qwen3 Coder Flash has a directly sourced output price: $0.975 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Qwen3 Coder Flash?+

Qwen3 Coder Flash has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT supports 131K and Qwen3 Coder Flash supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Qwen3 Coder Flash?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Qwen3 Coder Flash be self-hosted?+

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is open weight; Qwen3 Coder Flash is not marked open weight.

Can ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT and Qwen3 Coder Flash understand images?+

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is not documented with image input; Qwen3 Coder Flash is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Qwen3 Coder Flash?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is — and Qwen3 Coder Flash is —.

Do ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT and Qwen3 Coder Flash support reasoning and tool use?+

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT: none of these features are definitively sourced. Qwen3 Coder Flash: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Qwen3 Coder Flash?+

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT has 0 sourced provider routes; Qwen3 Coder Flash has 2, so Qwen3 Coder Flash has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Qwen3 Coder Flash?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback