ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT vs Lyria 3.5
At a Glance
| Compare |  ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PTBaidu |  Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 131K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 22, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT | Lyria 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Baidu | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Ernie 4 5 0 3b Pt | Lyria |
| Model | ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT | Lyria 3.5 |
| Version | ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT | Lyria 3.5 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-07-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text, Audio |
| Context window | 131K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | 360.7M | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Unknown | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Unknown | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation | generation, image-to-music, lyrics, music-generation, synthid, vocals |
ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT Capabilities
Lyria 3.5 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT vs Lyria 3.5 FAQs
Is ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Lyria 3.5 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT and Lyria 3.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Lyria 3.5?+
Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.
Which has a larger context window, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Lyria 3.5?+
Lyria 3.5 has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT supports 131K and Lyria 3.5 supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Lyria 3.5?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Lyria 3.5 be self-hosted?+
ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is open weight; Lyria 3.5 is not marked open weight.
Can ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT and Lyria 3.5 understand images?+
ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is not documented with image input; Lyria 3.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Lyria 3.5?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is — and Lyria 3.5 is 66K.
Do ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT and Lyria 3.5 support reasoning and tool use?+
ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT: none of these features are definitively sourced. Lyria 3.5: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Lyria 3.5?+
ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT has 0 sourced provider routes; Lyria 3.5 has 2, so Lyria 3.5 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Lyria 3.5?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.