ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT vs Grok 4.5

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#25 of 4660.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#15 of 44$0.063 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#11 of 3859.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$2.00Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$6.00Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K500K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTGrok 4.5
DeveloperBaiduxAI
FamilyErnie 4 5 0 3b PtGrok 4
ModelERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTGrok 4.5
VersionERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTGrok 4.5
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2026-07-16
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K500K
Total parameters360.7MUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownXai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generationchat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT Capabilities

chatgeneration
Serving providers0
Canonical IDbaidu/ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT

Grok 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.5

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT vs Grok 4.5 FAQs

Is ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Grok 4.5 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT and Grok 4.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Grok 4.5?+

Only Grok 4.5 has a directly sourced input price: $2.00 per million tokens. Only Grok 4.5 has a directly sourced output price: $6.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Grok 4.5?+

Grok 4.5 has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT supports 131K and Grok 4.5 supports 500K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Grok 4.5?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Grok 4.5 be self-hosted?+

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is open weight; Grok 4.5 is not marked open weight.

Can ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT and Grok 4.5 understand images?+

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is not documented with image input; Grok 4.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Grok 4.5?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is — and Grok 4.5 is —.

Do ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT and Grok 4.5 support reasoning and tool use?+

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT: none of these features are definitively sourced. Grok 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Grok 4.5?+

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT has 0 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.5 has 1, so Grok 4.5 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or Grok 4.5?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback