ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT vs DeepSeek R1
At a Glance
| Compare |  ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PTBaidu |  DeepSeek R1DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.70Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $2.50Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 131K | 164K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT | DeepSeek-R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Baidu | DeepSeek |
| Family | Ernie 4 5 0 3b Pt | Deepseek R1 |
| Model | ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT | DeepSeek-R1 |
| Version | ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT | DeepSeek-R1 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2025-01-20 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 131K | 164K |
| Total parameters | 360.7M | 684.5B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 37B |
| License | apache-2.0 | mit |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Unknown | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation | chat, generation, reasoning |
ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT Capabilities
DeepSeek R1 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs | DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT vs DeepSeek R1 FAQs
Is ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or DeepSeek R1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT and DeepSeek R1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or DeepSeek R1?+
Only DeepSeek R1 has a directly sourced input price: $0.70 per million tokens. Only DeepSeek R1 has a directly sourced output price: $2.50 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or DeepSeek R1?+
DeepSeek R1 has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT supports 131K and DeepSeek R1 supports 164K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or DeepSeek R1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or DeepSeek R1 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is open weight; DeepSeek R1 is open weight.
Can ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT and DeepSeek R1 understand images?+
ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is not documented with image input; DeepSeek R1 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or DeepSeek R1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is — and DeepSeek R1 is 33K.
Do ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT and DeepSeek R1 support reasoning and tool use?+
ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT: none of these features are definitively sourced. DeepSeek R1: reasoning. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or DeepSeek R1?+
ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT has 0 sourced provider routes; DeepSeek R1 has 2, so DeepSeek R1 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or DeepSeek R1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.