DeepSeek R1 vs Phi-4 Reasoning

At a Glance

Compare
DeepSeek R1DeepSeek
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4#42 of 570.4 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 0.1–66.8UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.70Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$2.50Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens164K33K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-R1Phi-4-reasoning
DeveloperDeepSeekMicrosoft
FamilyDeepseek R1Phi 4 Reasoning
ModelDeepSeek-R1Phi-4-reasoning
VersionDeepSeek-R1Phi-4-reasoning
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-01-202025-04-30
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window164K33K
Total parameters684.5B14.7B
Active parameters37BUnknown
Licensemitmit
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessHugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningchat, generation, reasoning

DeepSeek R1 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers2
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1

Phi-4 Reasoning Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmicrosoft/Phi-4-reasoning

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek R1 vs Phi-4 Reasoning FAQs

Is DeepSeek R1 or Phi-4 Reasoning better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek R1 and Phi-4 Reasoning, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

Only DeepSeek R1 has a directly sourced input price: $0.70 per million tokens. Only DeepSeek R1 has a directly sourced output price: $2.50 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek R1 or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

DeepSeek R1 has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek R1 supports 163,840 tokens and Phi-4 Reasoning supports 32,768 tokens.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek R1 or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can DeepSeek R1 or Phi-4 Reasoning be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek R1 is open weight; Phi-4 Reasoning is open weight.

Can DeepSeek R1 and Phi-4 Reasoning understand images?+

DeepSeek R1 is not documented with image input; Phi-4 Reasoning is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek R1 or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

DeepSeek R1 has a sourced maximum output of 32,768 tokens; Phi-4 Reasoning's maximum output is not reported. A larger limit cannot be determined.

Do DeepSeek R1 and Phi-4 Reasoning support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek R1: reasoning. Phi-4 Reasoning: reasoning. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek R1 or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

DeepSeek R1 has 2 sourced provider routes; Phi-4 Reasoning has 0, so DeepSeek R1 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek R1 or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback