DeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek V3

At a Glance

Compare
DeepSeek R1DeepSeek
DeepSeek V3DeepSeek
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4#42 of 570.4 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 0.1–66.8UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.70Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026$0.2574Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$2.50Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026$0.89Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens164K164K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Decision Notes

Workload evidence
LMArena Text Arena (text-2026-10-15-0ebb411abf00), human-preference rating: DeepSeek R1 1,372.6529, DeepSeek V3 1,332.4603 rating; higher is better. DeepSeek R1 leads this matched row. These results describe the published evaluation workloads, not a universal model winner or an independent Model Markets measurement. View evidence →
Reference request
For 1,000 uncached input and 1,000 output tokens on Openrouter (openai; Standard; regions: not specified; quantization: not specified), DeepSeek R1 is USD 0.003200 and DeepSeek V3 is USD 0.001286. Rates observed 2026-08-28 to 2026-08-29. Reference-request estimate v1: (1,000 × input rate + 1,000 × output rate) / 1,000,000. Excludes cache, tool calls, retries, other fees and taxes; this is not measured task cost. View evidence →Published price source 1 ↗ Published price source 2 ↗
Deployment requirements
DeepSeek R1 is documented as self-hostable; DeepSeek V3 is documented as self-hostable. Recorded licenses: DeepSeek R1, mit; DeepSeek V3, not reported. If you need local deployment, verify the license and hardware requirements; an unknown field does not establish permission or lack of support. View evidence →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1DeepSeek-V3
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-10-15-0ebb411abf00 · arena_rating · leader1,372.65100% of row best · rating · deepseek-r1; 95% CI [1367.80631687, 1377.49940563]; votes 18524; rank 1811,332.4697% of row best · rating · deepseek-v3; 95% CI [1327.72698428, 1337.19353550]; votes 21770; rank 224
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-R1DeepSeek-V3
DeveloperDeepSeekDeepSeek
FamilyDeepseek R1Deepseek V3
ModelDeepSeek-R1DeepSeek-V3
VersionDeepSeek-R1DeepSeek-V3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-01-202024-12-26
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window164K164K
Total parameters684.5B684.5B
Active parameters37B37B
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessHugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningchat, generation

DeepSeek R1 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers2
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1

DeepSeek V3 Capabilities

chatgeneration
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek V3 FAQs

Is DeepSeek R1 or DeepSeek V3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek R1 and DeepSeek V3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 or DeepSeek V3?+

DeepSeek R1 is $0.70 and DeepSeek V3 is $0.2574 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V3 is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek R1 is $2.50 and DeepSeek V3 is $0.89 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V3 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek R1 or DeepSeek V3?+

Both models have the same sourced context window: 163,840 tokens each.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek R1 or DeepSeek V3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can DeepSeek R1 or DeepSeek V3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek R1 is open weight; DeepSeek V3 is open weight.

Can DeepSeek R1 and DeepSeek V3 understand images?+

DeepSeek R1 is not documented with image input; DeepSeek V3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek R1 or DeepSeek V3?+

DeepSeek R1 has a sourced maximum output of 32,768 tokens; DeepSeek V3's maximum output is not reported. A larger limit cannot be determined.

Do DeepSeek R1 and DeepSeek V3 support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek R1: reasoning. DeepSeek V3: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek R1 or DeepSeek V3?+

DeepSeek R1 has 2 sourced provider routes; DeepSeek V3 has 3, so DeepSeek V3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek R1 or DeepSeek V3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback