DeepSeek R1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
At a Glance
| Compare |  DeepSeek R1DeepSeek |  Muse Glimmer 30BMeta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.70Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026 | $0.30Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $2.50Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026 | $1.20Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 164K | 131K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,372.6099% of row best · rating · deepseek-r1; 95% CI [1367.75270193, 1377.44238946]; votes 18524; rank 168 | 1,391.83100% of row best · rating · muse-glimmer; 95% CI [1381.91395107, 1401.75084313]; votes 3666; rank 152 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | DeepSeek-R1 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Family | Deepseek R1 | Muse Glimmer |
| Model | DeepSeek-R1 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
| Version | DeepSeek-R1 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | 2026-08-09 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2026-01-04 |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 164K | 131K |
| Total parameters | 684.5B | 29.8B |
| Active parameters | 37B | Unknown |
| License | mit | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
DeepSeek R1 Capabilities
Muse Glimmer 30B Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | family variantstext |
DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
DeepSeek R1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B FAQs
Is DeepSeek R1 or Muse Glimmer 30B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek R1 and Muse Glimmer 30B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
DeepSeek R1 is $0.70 and Muse Glimmer 30B is $0.30 per million tokens, so Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek R1 is $2.50 and Muse Glimmer 30B is $1.20 per million tokens, so Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek R1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
DeepSeek R1 has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek R1 supports 164K and Muse Glimmer 30B supports 131K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek R1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can DeepSeek R1 or Muse Glimmer 30B be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek R1 is open weight; Muse Glimmer 30B is open weight.
Can DeepSeek R1 and Muse Glimmer 30B understand images?+
DeepSeek R1 is not documented with image input; Muse Glimmer 30B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek R1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek R1 is 33K and Muse Glimmer 30B is —.
Do DeepSeek R1 and Muse Glimmer 30B support reasoning and tool use?+
DeepSeek R1: reasoning. Muse Glimmer 30B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek R1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
DeepSeek R1 has 2 sourced provider routes; Muse Glimmer 30B has 3, so Muse Glimmer 30B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, DeepSeek R1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.