Command A Reasoning vs Granite 4.2 30B
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Command A Reasoning | Granite 4.2 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Cohere | IBM |
| Family | Command A | Granite 4 2 |
| Model | Command A Reasoning | Granite 4.2 30B |
| Version | Command A Reasoning | Granite 4.2 30B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-08-21 | 2026-08-25 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-06-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 256K | 131K |
| Total parameters | 111B | 29.3B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Cohere (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, citations, reasoning, rag, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
15 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Command A Reasoning Capabilities
Granite 4.2 30B Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Command A ReasoningCohere | cross-developer peerstext |
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs | Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs | Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Command A ReasoningCohere | cross-developer peerstext |
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs | GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs | Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Command A ReasoningCohere | cross-developer peerstext |
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs | Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Command A Reasoning vs Granite 4.2 30B FAQs
Is Command A Reasoning or Granite 4.2 30B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Command A Reasoning and Granite 4.2 30B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Command A Reasoning or Granite 4.2 30B?+
Only Granite 4.2 30B has a directly sourced input price: $0.16 per million tokens. Only Granite 4.2 30B has a directly sourced output price: $0.65 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Command A Reasoning or Granite 4.2 30B?+
Command A Reasoning has the larger sourced context window. Command A Reasoning supports 256K and Granite 4.2 30B supports 131K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Command A Reasoning or Granite 4.2 30B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Command A Reasoning or Granite 4.2 30B be self-hosted?+
Granite 4.2 30B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Command A Reasoning is not marked open weight; Granite 4.2 30B is open weight.
Can Command A Reasoning and Granite 4.2 30B understand images?+
Command A Reasoning is not documented with image input; Granite 4.2 30B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Command A Reasoning or Granite 4.2 30B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Command A Reasoning is 32K and Granite 4.2 30B is —.
Do Command A Reasoning and Granite 4.2 30B support reasoning and tool use?+
Command A Reasoning: reasoning and tool calling. Granite 4.2 30B: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Command A Reasoning or Granite 4.2 30B?+
Command A Reasoning has 1 sourced provider route; Granite 4.2 30B has 1, a tie.
Which offers better value, Command A Reasoning or Granite 4.2 30B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.