Command A Reasoning vs Granite 4.2 30B

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort#43 of 570.0 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 0.0–66.7
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.16Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 11, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.65Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 11, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens256K131K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 2, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldCommand A ReasoningGranite 4.2 30B
DeveloperCohereIBM
FamilyCommand AGranite 4 2
ModelCommand A ReasoningGranite 4.2 30B
VersionCommand A ReasoningGranite 4.2 30B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-08-212026-08-25
Knowledge cutoff2024-06-01Unknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window256K131K
Total parameters111B29.3B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessCohere (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, citations, reasoning, rag, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Command A Reasoning Capabilities

agentschatcitationsreasoningragstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDcoherelabs/command-a-reasoning-08-2025

Granite 4.2 30B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-4.2-30b

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Command A Reasoning vs Granite 4.2 30B FAQs

Is Command A Reasoning or Granite 4.2 30B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Command A Reasoning and Granite 4.2 30B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Command A Reasoning or Granite 4.2 30B?+

Only Granite 4.2 30B has a directly sourced input price: $0.16 per million tokens. Only Granite 4.2 30B has a directly sourced output price: $0.65 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Command A Reasoning or Granite 4.2 30B?+

Command A Reasoning has the larger sourced context window. Command A Reasoning supports 256,000 tokens and Granite 4.2 30B supports 131,072 tokens.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Command A Reasoning or Granite 4.2 30B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Command A Reasoning or Granite 4.2 30B be self-hosted?+

Granite 4.2 30B is documented as self-hostable; Command A Reasoning is documented as not self-hostable. Command A Reasoning is not marked open weight; Granite 4.2 30B is open weight.

Can Command A Reasoning and Granite 4.2 30B understand images?+

Command A Reasoning is not documented with image input; Granite 4.2 30B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Command A Reasoning or Granite 4.2 30B?+

Command A Reasoning has a sourced maximum output of 32,000 tokens; Granite 4.2 30B's maximum output is not reported. A larger limit cannot be determined.

Do Command A Reasoning and Granite 4.2 30B support reasoning and tool use?+

Command A Reasoning: reasoning and tool calling. Granite 4.2 30B: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Command A Reasoning or Granite 4.2 30B?+

Command A Reasoning has 1 sourced provider route; Granite 4.2 30B has 1, a tie.

Which offers better value, Command A Reasoning or Granite 4.2 30B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback