Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 vs Claude Opus 4.7
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2 | UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort | #6 of 2278.9 score |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #31 of 36$0.286 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0 | UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort | #12 of 2251.8 score |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Cohere | Anthropic |
| Family | Command A Plus 05 | Claude 4 |
| Model | command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Version | command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-04-16 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2026-01-01 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 200K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 218.8B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 25B | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Unknown | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Unknown | Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
11 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 Capabilities
Claude Opus 4.7 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  MiniMax-M3MiniMax | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 vs Claude Opus 4.7 FAQs
Is Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or Claude Opus 4.7 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 and Claude Opus 4.7, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or Claude Opus 4.7?+
Only Claude Opus 4.7 has a directly sourced input price: $5.00 per million tokens. Only Claude Opus 4.7 has a directly sourced output price: $25.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or Claude Opus 4.7?+
Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger sourced context window. Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 supports 200K and Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or Claude Opus 4.7?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or Claude Opus 4.7 be self-hosted?+
Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 is open weight; Claude Opus 4.7 is not marked open weight.
Can Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 and Claude Opus 4.7 understand images?+
Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 is documented with image input; Claude Opus 4.7 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or Claude Opus 4.7?+
Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger sourced maximum output: Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 supports 66K and Claude Opus 4.7 supports 128K output tokens.
Do Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 and Claude Opus 4.7 support reasoning and tool use?+
Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16: tool calling and image input. Claude Opus 4.7: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or Claude Opus 4.7?+
Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 has 0 sourced provider routes; Claude Opus 4.7 has 2, so Claude Opus 4.7 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or Claude Opus 4.7?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.