Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 vs GPT-5.2

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
Rankingcommand-a-plus-05-2026-bf16GPT-5.2
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort#18 of 2249.3 score
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort#23 of 36$0.161 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort#19 of 2242.6 score

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Cohere · activeCommand A Plus 05 2026 BF16Verified Aug 28, 2026
OpenAI · activeGPT-5.2Verified Sep 3, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
Fieldcommand-a-plus-05-2026-bf16GPT-5.2
DeveloperCohereOpenAI
FamilyCommand A Plus 05Gpt 5 2
Modelcommand-a-plus-05-2026-bf16GPT-5.2
Versioncommand-a-plus-05-2026-bf16GPT-5.2
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2025-12-11
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2025-08-31
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K400K
Total parameters218.8BUnknown
Active parameters25BUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

11 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDCohereLabs/command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16

GPT-5.2 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$1.75
Output price$14.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5.2

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 vs GPT-5.2 FAQs

Is Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or GPT-5.2 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 and GPT-5.2, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or GPT-5.2?+

Only GPT-5.2 has a directly sourced input price: $1.75 per million tokens. Only GPT-5.2 has a directly sourced output price: $14.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or GPT-5.2?+

GPT-5.2 has the larger sourced context window. Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 supports 200K and GPT-5.2 supports 400K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or GPT-5.2?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or GPT-5.2 be self-hosted?+

Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 is open weight; GPT-5.2 is not marked open weight.

Can Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 and GPT-5.2 understand images?+

Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 is documented with image input; GPT-5.2 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or GPT-5.2?+

GPT-5.2 has the larger sourced maximum output: Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 supports 66K and GPT-5.2 supports 128K output tokens.

Do Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 and GPT-5.2 support reasoning and tool use?+

Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16: tool calling and image input. GPT-5.2: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or GPT-5.2?+

Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 has 0 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.2 has 2, so GPT-5.2 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or GPT-5.2?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback