Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 vs ERNIE X1.1

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K66K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

Fieldcommand-a-plus-05-2026-bf16ERNIE X1.1
DeveloperCohereBaidu
FamilyCommand A Plus 05Ernie X1
Modelcommand-a-plus-05-2026-bf16ERNIE X1.1
Versioncommand-a-plus-05-2026-bf16ERNIE X1.1
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2025-09-26
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K66K
Total parameters218.8BUnknown
Active parameters25BUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownBaidu Qianfan (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolsagents, chat, reasoning, search, tools

Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDCohereLabs/command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16

ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities

agentschatreasoningsearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbaidu/ernie-x1.1

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 vs ERNIE X1.1 FAQs

Is Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or ERNIE X1.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 and ERNIE X1.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or ERNIE X1.1?+

Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced output price: $4.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or ERNIE X1.1?+

Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 has the larger sourced context window. Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 supports 200K and ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or ERNIE X1.1?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or ERNIE X1.1 be self-hosted?+

Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 is open weight; ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight.

Can Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 and ERNIE X1.1 understand images?+

Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 is documented with image input; ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or ERNIE X1.1?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 is 66K and ERNIE X1.1 is 66K.

Do Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 and ERNIE X1.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16: tool calling and image input. ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or ERNIE X1.1?+

Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 has 0 sourced provider routes; ERNIE X1.1 has 1, so ERNIE X1.1 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 or ERNIE X1.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback