Codestral 22B v0.1 vs Jev

At a Glance

Compare
JevTypeSafe
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.042TypeSafe · Sep 17, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.000TypeSafe · Sep 17, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens33K64K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 17, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldCodestral-22B-v0.1Jev
DeveloperMistral AITypeSafe
FamilyCodestral 22b V0 1Jev
ModelCodestral-22B-v0.1Jev
VersionCodestral-22B-v0.1Jev
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2026-09-15
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Model-specific input
Output modalitiesTextModel-specific input
Context window33K64K
Total parameters22.2BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseotherUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownTypeSafe (Standard)
Capabilitiesgenerationcalibrated-confidence, parallel-evaluation, structured_outputs, typed-decisions
Maximum Choice cardinalityUnknown255 options
Default request rate limitUnknown1200 requests per minute
State plus longest question limitUnknown32000 tokens
Combined state and questions limitUnknown64000 tokens
Default token rate limitUnknown250000 tokens per second

Codestral 22B v0.1 Capabilities

generation
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmistralai/Codestral-22B-v0.1

Jev Capabilities

calibrated-confidenceparallel-evaluationstructured outputstyped-decisions
Serving providers1
Canonical IDtypesafe/jev

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Codestral 22B v0.1 vs Jev FAQs

Is Codestral 22B v0.1 or Jev better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Codestral 22B v0.1 and Jev, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Codestral 22B v0.1 or Jev?+

Only Jev has a directly sourced input price: $0.042 per million tokens. Only Jev has a directly sourced output price: $0.000 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Codestral 22B v0.1 or Jev?+

Jev has the larger sourced context window. Codestral 22B v0.1 supports 33K and Jev supports 64K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Codestral 22B v0.1 or Jev?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Codestral 22B v0.1 or Jev be self-hosted?+

Codestral 22B v0.1 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Codestral 22B v0.1 is open weight; Jev is not marked open weight.

Can Codestral 22B v0.1 and Jev understand images?+

Codestral 22B v0.1 is not documented with image input; Jev is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Codestral 22B v0.1 or Jev?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Codestral 22B v0.1 is — and Jev is —.

Do Codestral 22B v0.1 and Jev support reasoning and tool use?+

Codestral 22B v0.1: none of these features are definitively sourced. Jev: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Codestral 22B v0.1 or Jev?+

Codestral 22B v0.1 has 0 sourced provider routes; Jev has 1, so Jev has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Codestral 22B v0.1 or Jev?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback