Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#36 of 4627.7 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 18.5–51.8UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$3.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$5.00Openai · Sep 9, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$15.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$30.00Openai · Sep 9, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200KNot reported
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 9, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-Image-2.5 Sunburst
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI
FamilyClaude 4Gpt Image 2 5
ModelClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-Image-2.5 Sunburst
VersionClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-Image-2.5 Sunburst
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-09-292026-09-08
Knowledge cutoff2025-01-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextImage
Context window200KUnknown
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoUnknown
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoUnknown
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard)Openai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolsimage-editing, image-generation, inpainting
Default usage-tier rate limitsUnknownTier 1: 100,000 TPM, 5 IPM, Tier 2: 250,000 TPM, 20 IPM, Tier 3: 800,000 TPM, 50 IPM, Tier 4: 3,000,000 TPM, 150 IPM, Tier 5: 8,000,000 TPM, 250 IPM
Default snapshotUnknowngpt-image-2.5-sunburst-2026-09-08
Model positioningUnknownMost capable GPT Image model for editing precision
Quality settingsUnknownlow, medium, high, xhigh, max, auto
Supported API routesUnknownv1/images/generations, v1/images/edits
Unsupported API routesUnknownv1/assistants, v1/audio/speech, v1/audio/transcriptions, v1/audio/translations, v1/batch, v1/chat/completions, v1/completions, v1/embeddings, v1/fine-tuning, v1/moderations, v1/realtime, v1/realtime/transcription_sessions, v1/realtime/translations, v1/responses, v1/videos

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5

GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst Capabilities

image-editingimage-generationinpainting
Serving providers1
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-image-2.5-sunburst

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst FAQs

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst?+

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $3.00 and GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst is $5.00 per million tokens, so Claude Sonnet 4.5 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $15.00 and GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst is $30.00 per million tokens, so Claude Sonnet 4.5 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is 200K and GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst is —.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst be self-hosted?+

Neither model is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is not marked open weight; GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst is of unknown open-weight status.

Can Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst understand images?+

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is documented with image input; GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is 64K and GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst is —.

Do Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Sonnet 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst?+

Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 1 sourced provider route; GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst has 1, a tie.

Which offers better value, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-Image 2.5 Sunburst?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback