Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs ERNIE X1.1
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic |  ERNIE X1.1Baidu |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #36 of 4627.7 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 18.5–51.8 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $3.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $15.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 200K | 66K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | ERNIE X1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Baidu |
| Family | Claude 4 | Ernie X1 |
| Model | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | ERNIE X1.1 |
| Version | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | ERNIE X1.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-09-29 | 2025-09-26 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 200K | 66K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard) | Baidu Qianfan (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | agents, chat, reasoning, search, tools |
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Capabilities
ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs ERNIE X1.1 FAQs
Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or ERNIE X1.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Sonnet 4.5 and ERNIE X1.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or ERNIE X1.1?+
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $3.00 and ERNIE X1.1 is $1.00 per million tokens, so ERNIE X1.1 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $15.00 and ERNIE X1.1 is $4.00 per million tokens, so ERNIE X1.1 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or ERNIE X1.1?+
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200K and ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or ERNIE X1.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Claude Sonnet 4.5 or ERNIE X1.1 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is not marked open weight; ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Claude Sonnet 4.5 and ERNIE X1.1 understand images?+
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is documented with image input; ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or ERNIE X1.1?+
ERNIE X1.1 has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 64K and ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K output tokens.
Do Claude Sonnet 4.5 and ERNIE X1.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Sonnet 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or ERNIE X1.1?+
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 1 sourced provider route; ERNIE X1.1 has 1, a tie.
Which offers better value, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or ERNIE X1.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.