Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Codestral 22B v0.1
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | Codestral 22B v0.1Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #36 of 4627.7 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 18.5–51.8 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $3.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $15.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 200K | 33K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Codestral-22B-v0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Mistral AI |
| Family | Claude 4 | Codestral 22b V0 1 |
| Model | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Codestral-22B-v0.1 |
| Version | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Codestral-22B-v0.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-09-29 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 200K | 33K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 22.2B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | other |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Unknown |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | generation |
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Capabilities
Codestral 22B v0.1 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Codestral 22B v0.1 FAQs
Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Codestral 22B v0.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Codestral 22B v0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Codestral 22B v0.1?+
Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a directly sourced input price: $3.00 per million tokens. Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a directly sourced output price: $15.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Codestral 22B v0.1?+
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200K and Codestral 22B v0.1 supports 33K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Codestral 22B v0.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Codestral 22B v0.1 be self-hosted?+
Codestral 22B v0.1 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is not marked open weight; Codestral 22B v0.1 is open weight.
Can Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Codestral 22B v0.1 understand images?+
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is documented with image input; Codestral 22B v0.1 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Codestral 22B v0.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is 64K and Codestral 22B v0.1 is —.
Do Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Codestral 22B v0.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Sonnet 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Codestral 22B v0.1: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Codestral 22B v0.1?+
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 1 sourced provider route; Codestral 22B v0.1 has 0, so Claude Sonnet 4.5 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Codestral 22B v0.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.