Claude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,504.96100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-5-max; 95% CI [1499.16488972, 1510.76500615]; votes 16839; rank 1 | 1,450.2296% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1446.44654530, 1453.99996127]; votes 60845; rank 43 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark winOverall lead | 0 benchmark wins |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Opus 5 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | xAI |
| Family | Claude 5 | Grok 4 20 |
| Model | Claude Opus 5 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Version | Claude Opus 5 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2026-07-24 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | xAI (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | generation, reasoning, research, tools |
13 comparable fields · 7 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Claude Opus 5 Capabilities
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Opus 5Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Opus 5Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs | Claude Opus 5Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Opus 5Anthropic | vs | Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
| vs | Grok 4.6xAI | family variantsimage, text | |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Opus 5Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 5Anthropic | vs |  GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 5Anthropic | vs | GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 5Anthropic | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 5Anthropic | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent FAQs
Is Claude Opus 5 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 5 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?+
Claude Opus 5 is $5.00 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is $1.25 per million tokens, so Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper on this metric. Claude Opus 5 is $25.00 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is $2.50 per million tokens, so Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 5 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Claude Opus 5 is 1,000,000 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is 1,000,000.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 5 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Claude Opus 5 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Opus 5 is not marked open weight; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is not marked open weight.
Can Claude Opus 5 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent understand images?+
Claude Opus 5 is documented with image input; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 5 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Opus 5 is 128,000 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is —.
Do Claude Opus 5 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Opus 5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 5 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?+
Claude Opus 5 has 3 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 1, so Claude Opus 5 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Opus 5 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.