Claude Opus 4.8 vs Sonar Deep Research
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic |  Sonar Deep ResearchPerplexity |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #18 of 4670.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #42 of 44$0.604 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | #35 of 3840.5 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $2.00Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $25.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $8.00Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 128K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Opus 4.8 | Sonar Deep Research |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Perplexity |
| Family | Claude 4 8 | Sonar |
| Model | Claude Opus 4.8 | Sonar Deep Research |
| Version | Claude Opus 4.8 | Sonar Deep Research |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-05-28 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2026-01-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 128K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard) | Openrouter (Standard), Perplexity (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, citations, reasoning, research, search |
Claude Opus 4.8 Capabilities
Sonar Deep Research Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Sonar Deep Research FAQs
Is Claude Opus 4.8 or Sonar Deep Research better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 4.8 and Sonar Deep Research, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Sonar Deep Research?+
Claude Opus 4.8 is $5.00 and Sonar Deep Research is $2.00 per million tokens, so Sonar Deep Research is cheaper on this metric. Claude Opus 4.8 is $25.00 and Sonar Deep Research is $8.00 per million tokens, so Sonar Deep Research is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.8 or Sonar Deep Research?+
Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Opus 4.8 supports 1,000K and Sonar Deep Research supports 128K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.8 or Sonar Deep Research?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Claude Opus 4.8 or Sonar Deep Research be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Opus 4.8 is not marked open weight; Sonar Deep Research is not marked open weight.
Can Claude Opus 4.8 and Sonar Deep Research understand images?+
Claude Opus 4.8 is documented with image input; Sonar Deep Research is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 4.8 or Sonar Deep Research?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Opus 4.8 is 128K and Sonar Deep Research is —.
Do Claude Opus 4.8 and Sonar Deep Research support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Opus 4.8: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Sonar Deep Research: reasoning. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 4.8 or Sonar Deep Research?+
Claude Opus 4.8 has 2 sourced provider routes; Sonar Deep Research has 2, a tie.
Which offers better value, Claude Opus 4.8 or Sonar Deep Research?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.