Claude Opus 4.8 vs Granite Guardian 4.1 8B

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#18 of 4670.1 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#42 of 44$0.604 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#35 of 3840.5 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$25.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000K131K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Opus 4.8granite-guardian-4.1-8b
DeveloperAnthropicIBM
FamilyClaude 4 8Granite Guardian 4 1 8b
ModelClaude Opus 4.8granite-guardian-4.1-8b
VersionClaude Opus 4.8granite-guardian-4.1-8b
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-05-28Unknown
Knowledge cutoff2026-01-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K131K
Total parametersUnknown8.4B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, tools

Claude Opus 4.8 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-opus-4-8

Granite Guardian 4.1 8B Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-guardian-4.1-8b

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Granite Guardian 4.1 8B FAQs

Is Claude Opus 4.8 or Granite Guardian 4.1 8B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 4.8 and Granite Guardian 4.1 8B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Granite Guardian 4.1 8B?+

Only Claude Opus 4.8 has a directly sourced input price: $5.00 per million tokens. Only Claude Opus 4.8 has a directly sourced output price: $25.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.8 or Granite Guardian 4.1 8B?+

Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Opus 4.8 supports 1,000K and Granite Guardian 4.1 8B supports 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.8 or Granite Guardian 4.1 8B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Claude Opus 4.8 or Granite Guardian 4.1 8B be self-hosted?+

Granite Guardian 4.1 8B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Opus 4.8 is not marked open weight; Granite Guardian 4.1 8B is open weight.

Can Claude Opus 4.8 and Granite Guardian 4.1 8B understand images?+

Claude Opus 4.8 is documented with image input; Granite Guardian 4.1 8B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 4.8 or Granite Guardian 4.1 8B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Opus 4.8 is 128K and Granite Guardian 4.1 8B is —.

Do Claude Opus 4.8 and Granite Guardian 4.1 8B support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Opus 4.8: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Granite Guardian 4.1 8B: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 4.8 or Granite Guardian 4.1 8B?+

Claude Opus 4.8 has 2 sourced provider routes; Granite Guardian 4.1 8B has 0, so Claude Opus 4.8 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Opus 4.8 or Granite Guardian 4.1 8B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback