Claude Opus 4.8 vs Granite Embedding 30m English
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #18 of 4670.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #42 of 44$0.604 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | #35 of 3840.5 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $25.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 1K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Opus 4.8 | granite-embedding-30m-english |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | IBM |
| Family | Claude 4 8 | Granite Embedding 30m English |
| Model | Claude Opus 4.8 | granite-embedding-30m-english |
| Version | Claude Opus 4.8 | granite-embedding-30m-english |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-05-28 | 2025-08-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2026-01-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Embedding |
| Context window | 1,000K | 1K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 30.3M |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard) | Hugging Face (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | embeddings |
Claude Opus 4.8 Capabilities
Granite Embedding 30m English Capabilities
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Granite Embedding 30m English FAQs
Is Claude Opus 4.8 or Granite Embedding 30m English better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 4.8 and Granite Embedding 30m English, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+
Only Claude Opus 4.8 has a directly sourced input price: $5.00 per million tokens. Only Claude Opus 4.8 has a directly sourced output price: $25.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.8 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+
Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Opus 4.8 supports 1,000K and Granite Embedding 30m English supports 1K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.8 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Claude Opus 4.8 or Granite Embedding 30m English be self-hosted?+
Granite Embedding 30m English is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Opus 4.8 is not marked open weight; Granite Embedding 30m English is open weight.
Can Claude Opus 4.8 and Granite Embedding 30m English understand images?+
Claude Opus 4.8 is documented with image input; Granite Embedding 30m English is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 4.8 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Opus 4.8 is 128K and Granite Embedding 30m English is —.
Do Claude Opus 4.8 and Granite Embedding 30m English support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Opus 4.8: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Granite Embedding 30m English: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 4.8 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+
Claude Opus 4.8 has 2 sourced provider routes; Granite Embedding 30m English has 1, so Claude Opus 4.8 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Opus 4.8 or Granite Embedding 30m English?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.