Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini Computer Use
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic |  Gemini Computer UseGoogle DeepMind |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #18 of 4670.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #42 of 44$0.604 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | #35 of 3840.5 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $1.25Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $25.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $10.00Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 128K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Opus 4.8 | Gemini Computer Use |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Claude 4 8 | Gemini Tools |
| Model | Claude Opus 4.8 | Gemini Computer Use |
| Version | Claude Opus 4.8 | Gemini Computer Use |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2026-05-28 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2026-01-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 128K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard) | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | generation, reasoning, tools |
Claude Opus 4.8 Capabilities
Gemini Computer Use Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini Computer Use FAQs
Is Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini Computer Use better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 4.8 and Gemini Computer Use, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini Computer Use?+
Claude Opus 4.8 is $5.00 and Gemini Computer Use is $1.25 per million tokens, so Gemini Computer Use is cheaper on this metric. Claude Opus 4.8 is $25.00 and Gemini Computer Use is $10.00 per million tokens, so Gemini Computer Use is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini Computer Use?+
Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Opus 4.8 supports 1,000K and Gemini Computer Use supports 128K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini Computer Use?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini Computer Use be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Opus 4.8 is not marked open weight; Gemini Computer Use is not marked open weight.
Can Claude Opus 4.8 and Gemini Computer Use understand images?+
Claude Opus 4.8 is documented with image input; Gemini Computer Use is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini Computer Use?+
Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Opus 4.8 supports 128K and Gemini Computer Use supports 64K output tokens.
Do Claude Opus 4.8 and Gemini Computer Use support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Opus 4.8: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Gemini Computer Use: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini Computer Use?+
Claude Opus 4.8 has 2 sourced provider routes; Gemini Computer Use has 2, a tie.
Which offers better value, Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini Computer Use?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.