Claude Opus 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.2

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#27 of 4655.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 36.9–70.3UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#40 of 44$0.380 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#36 of 3838.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 28.8–45.4UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$25.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200KNot reported
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,447.0897% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-5-20251101-high-32k; 95% CI [1443.17965746, 1450.98398333]; votes 36239; rank 491,489.44100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.2 (xHigh); 95% CI [1478.95697715, 1499.92080617]; votes 3227; rank 11
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader77.3995% of row best · percent · claude-opus-4-5-20251101-thinking-64k-high-effort · 15,203 output tokens / case81.88100% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.2-xhigh · 18,700 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins2 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Opus 4.5Muse Spark 1.2
DeveloperAnthropicMeta
FamilyClaude 4Muse Spark
ModelClaude Opus 4.5Muse Spark 1.2
VersionClaude Opus 4.5Muse Spark 1.2
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2025-11-242026-08-05
Knowledge cutoff2025-05-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200KUnknown
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools

Claude Opus 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-opus-4-5

Muse Spark 1.2 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchstructured outputstools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.2

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.2 FAQs

Is Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.2, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Only Claude Opus 4.5 has a directly sourced input price: $5.00 per million tokens. Only Claude Opus 4.5 has a directly sourced output price: $25.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Claude Opus 4.5 is 200K and Muse Spark 1.2 is —.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Muse Spark 1.2 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 2 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark 1.2 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Opus 4.5 is not marked open weight; Muse Spark 1.2 is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Opus 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.2 understand images?+

Claude Opus 4.5 is documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.2 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Opus 4.5 is 64K and Muse Spark 1.2 is —.

Do Claude Opus 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.2 support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Opus 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Muse Spark 1.2: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Claude Opus 4.5 has 1 sourced provider route; Muse Spark 1.2 has 0, so Claude Opus 4.5 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback