Claude Opus 4.5 vs Grok 4.3

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#27 of 4655.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 36.9–70.3#40 of 4616.6 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 11.1–44.4
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#40 of 44$0.380 per LiveBench case#7 of 44$0.028 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#36 of 3838.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 28.8–45.4#33 of 3846.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 43.3–59.9
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$1.25Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$25.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$2.50Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K1,000K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Grok 4.3
LMArena Search Arenasearch-2026-08-24-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,179.64100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-5-search; 95% CI [1174.02872051, 1185.26030035]; votes 61573; rank 191,164.8099% of row best · rating · grok-4.3; 95% CI [1159.64698972, 1169.95391272]; votes 91483; rank 23
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,447.08100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-5-20251101-high-32k; 95% CI [1443.17965746, 1450.98398333]; votes 36239; rank 491,397.7397% of row best · rating · grok-4.3; 95% CI [1394.01930088, 1401.44639527]; votes 66801; rank 145
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader77.39100% of row best · percent · claude-opus-4-5-20251101-thinking-64k-high-effort · 15,203 output tokens / case69.2790% of row best · percent · grok-4.3 · 11,184 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above3 benchmark winsOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Opus 4.5Grok 4.3
DeveloperAnthropicxAI
FamilyClaude 4Grok 4
ModelClaude Opus 4.5Grok 4.3
VersionClaude Opus 4.5Grok 4.3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-11-242026-06-17
Knowledge cutoff2025-05-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K1,000K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Claude Opus 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-opus-4-5

Grok 4.3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Grok 4.3 FAQs

Is Claude Opus 4.5 or Grok 4.3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 4.5 and Grok 4.3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Grok 4.3?+

Claude Opus 4.5 is $5.00 and Grok 4.3 is $1.25 per million tokens, so Grok 4.3 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Opus 4.5 is $25.00 and Grok 4.3 is $2.50 per million tokens, so Grok 4.3 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or Grok 4.3?+

Grok 4.3 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K and Grok 4.3 supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 or Grok 4.3?+

Claude Opus 4.5 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Claude Opus 4.5 or Grok 4.3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Opus 4.5 is not marked open weight; Grok 4.3 is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Opus 4.5 and Grok 4.3 understand images?+

Claude Opus 4.5 is documented with image input; Grok 4.3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 4.5 or Grok 4.3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Opus 4.5 is 64K and Grok 4.3 is —.

Do Claude Opus 4.5 and Grok 4.3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Opus 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 4.5 or Grok 4.3?+

Claude Opus 4.5 has 1 sourced provider route; Grok 4.3 has 1, a tie.

Which offers better value, Claude Opus 4.5 or Grok 4.3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback