Claude Fable 5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5 128B

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#2 of 4695.6 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#44 of 44$1.01 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#29 of 3847.8 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$10.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$50.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000K262K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader8.81100% of row best · score · Claude Fable 5 (High); 95% CI [7.56791873, 10.05963763]; sessions 38293; observations 2061291; rank 5-10.8882% of row best · score · Mistral Medium 3.5; 95% CI [-12.33636331, -9.41760729]; sessions 10244; observations 358935; rank 43
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,492.63100% of row best · rating · claude-fable-5; 95% CI [1487.86770992, 1497.38399139]; votes 30057; rank 71,420.5895% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1414.04225396, 1427.11615611]; votes 10996; rank 104
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,325.86100% of row best · rating · claude-fable-5; 95% CI [1317.96760009, 1333.76174084]; votes 11304; rank 11,222.0592% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1212.30064904, 1231.79518832]; votes 5090; rank 71
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above3 benchmark winsNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Fable 5Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B
DeveloperAnthropicMistral AI
FamilyClaude 5Mistral Medium 3 5 128b
ModelClaude Fable 5Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B
VersionClaude Fable 5Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-06-09Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K262K
Total parametersUnknown127.7B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownother
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

Claude Fable 5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-fable-5

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmistralai/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Fable 5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5 128B FAQs

Is Claude Fable 5 or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Fable 5 and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

Only Claude Fable 5 has a directly sourced input price: $10.00 per million tokens. Only Claude Fable 5 has a directly sourced output price: $50.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

Claude Fable 5 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Fable 5 supports 1,000K and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B supports 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Fable 5 or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Claude Fable 5 or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B be self-hosted?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Fable 5 is not marked open weight; Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is open weight.

Can Claude Fable 5 and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B understand images?+

Claude Fable 5 is documented with image input; Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Fable 5 or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Fable 5 is 128K and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is —.

Do Claude Fable 5 and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Fable 5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Fable 5 or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

Claude Fable 5 has 3 sourced provider routes; Mistral Medium 3.5 128B has 0, so Claude Fable 5 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Fable 5 or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback