Bonsai Image Ternary 4B vs Hy4 preview
At a Glance
| Compare | Bonsai Image Ternary 4BPrismML | Hy4 previewTencent |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.834Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $2.501Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | Not reported | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 18, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Bonsai Image Ternary 4B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | PrismML | Tencent |
| Family | Bonsai Image 4b | Hy4 |
| Model | Bonsai Image Ternary 4B | Hy4 preview |
| Version | Bonsai Image Ternary 4B | Hy4 preview |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2026-05-21 | 2026-08-28 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Image | Text |
| Context window | Unknown | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 4B | 770B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 49B |
| License | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | generation | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
| Base model | FLUX.2 Klein 4B | Unknown |
| Default resolution | 512 × 512 | Unknown |
| Transformer size | 1.21 GB | Unknown |
| Weight format | Ternary weights with FP16 group scales | Unknown |
Bonsai Image Ternary 4B Capabilities
Hy4 preview Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Bonsai Image Ternary 4B vs Hy4 preview FAQs
Is Bonsai Image Ternary 4B or Hy4 preview better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Bonsai Image Ternary 4B and Hy4 preview, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Bonsai Image Ternary 4B or Hy4 preview?+
Only Hy4 preview has a directly sourced input price: $0.834 per million tokens. Only Hy4 preview has a directly sourced output price: $2.501 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Bonsai Image Ternary 4B or Hy4 preview?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Bonsai Image Ternary 4B is — and Hy4 preview is 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Bonsai Image Ternary 4B or Hy4 preview?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Bonsai Image Ternary 4B or Hy4 preview be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Bonsai Image Ternary 4B is open weight; Hy4 preview is open weight.
Can Bonsai Image Ternary 4B and Hy4 preview understand images?+
Bonsai Image Ternary 4B is not documented with image input; Hy4 preview is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Bonsai Image Ternary 4B or Hy4 preview?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Bonsai Image Ternary 4B is — and Hy4 preview is —.
Do Bonsai Image Ternary 4B and Hy4 preview support reasoning and tool use?+
Bonsai Image Ternary 4B: none of these features are definitively sourced. Hy4 preview: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Bonsai Image Ternary 4B or Hy4 preview?+
Bonsai Image Ternary 4B has 0 sourced provider routes; Hy4 preview has 1, so Hy4 preview has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Bonsai Image Ternary 4B or Hy4 preview?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.