Bonsai 4B vs GLM 5

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Bonsai 4B and GLM 5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Only GLM 5 has a directly sourced input price: $0.60 per million tokens. Only GLM 5 has a directly sourced output price: $1.92 per million tokens.

GLM 5 has the larger sourced context window. Bonsai 4B supports 33K and GLM 5 supports 203K.

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Bonsai 4B is open weight; GLM 5 is open weight.

Bonsai 4B is not documented with image input; GLM 5 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Bonsai 4B is — and GLM 5 is —.

Bonsai 4B: none of these features are definitively sourced. GLM 5: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Bonsai 4B has 0 sourced provider routes; GLM 5 has 4, so GLM 5 has broader tracked availability.

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.