Antigravity Agent vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct
At a Glance
| Compare |  Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.1875Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.6525Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Antigravity Agent | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Meta |
| Family | Gemini Agents | Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e Instruct |
| Model | Antigravity Agent | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct |
| Version | Antigravity Agent | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct |
| Lifecycle | preview | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2025-04-05 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 401.6B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 17B |
| License | Unknown | other |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, tools |
Antigravity Agent Capabilities
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Antigravity Agent vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct FAQs
Is Antigravity Agent or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Antigravity Agent and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Antigravity Agent or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+
Only Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has a directly sourced input price: $0.1875 per million tokens. Only Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has a directly sourced output price: $0.6525 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Antigravity Agent or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+
Antigravity Agent has the larger sourced context window. Antigravity Agent supports 1,049K and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Antigravity Agent or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Antigravity Agent or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct be self-hosted?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Antigravity Agent is not marked open weight; Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is open weight.
Can Antigravity Agent and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct understand images?+
Antigravity Agent is documented with image input; Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Antigravity Agent or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Antigravity Agent is 66K and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is —.
Do Antigravity Agent and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct support reasoning and tool use?+
Antigravity Agent: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Antigravity Agent or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+
Antigravity Agent has 2 sourced provider routes; Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has 1, so Antigravity Agent has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Antigravity Agent or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.