Antigravity Agent vs Hy3
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Antigravity Agent | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Tencent |
| Family | Gemini Agents | Hy3 |
| Model | Antigravity Agent | Hy3 |
| Version | Antigravity Agent | Hy3 |
| Lifecycle | preview | active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,048,576 | 262,144 |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 298,786,155,776 |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 21,000,000,000 |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, tools |
13 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Antigravity Agent Capabilities
Hy3 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Hy3Tencent | vs | Hy4 previewTencent | family variantstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs | Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs | Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs | Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Hy3Tencent | cross-developer peerstext | |
MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax | vs | Hy3Tencent | cross-developer peerstext |
MiniMax-M2.5MiniMax | vs | Hy3Tencent | cross-developer peerstext |
| vs | Hy3Tencent | cross-developer peerstext | |
Mistral-Medium-3.5-128BMistral AI | vs | Hy3Tencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Devstral-2-123B-Instruct-2512Mistral AI | vs | Hy3Tencent | cross-developer peerstext |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Antigravity Agent vs Hy3 FAQs
Is Antigravity Agent or Hy3 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Antigravity Agent and Hy3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Antigravity Agent or Hy3?+
Only Hy3 has a directly sourced input price: $0.132 per million tokens. Only Hy3 has a directly sourced output price: $0.528 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Antigravity Agent or Hy3?+
Antigravity Agent has the larger sourced context window. Antigravity Agent supports 1,048,576 and Hy3 supports 262,144.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Antigravity Agent or Hy3?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Antigravity Agent or Hy3 be self-hosted?+
Hy3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Antigravity Agent is not marked open weight; Hy3 is open weight.
Can Antigravity Agent and Hy3 understand images?+
Antigravity Agent is documented with image input; Hy3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Antigravity Agent or Hy3?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Antigravity Agent is 65,536 and Hy3 is —.
Do Antigravity Agent and Hy3 support reasoning and tool use?+
Antigravity Agent: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Hy3: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Antigravity Agent or Hy3?+
Antigravity Agent has 1 sourced provider route; Hy3 has 2, so Hy3 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Antigravity Agent or Hy3?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.