Structured Output Model Comparison

Find models with documented structured-output support and compare price, context, tools, and provider breadth.

Interactive Tool

Build a Scenario

Runs in your browser
Ranking priority
Changes weights, not the eligibility gate.
Require tool calling
Requires documented tool support.
ResultValueHow to read it
Eligible models58Models that pass the selected evidence and constraint gates.
Ranked shortlist20Top candidates shown below.
Priced candidates50Models with both input and output price minima.
RankModelFit scoreContextInput / 1MWorkload costPublished benchmark rankProviders
1Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle DeepMind80.211.05M tokens$0.75 / 1M$150.0072
2Qwen3.8 MaxQwen78.721M tokens$1.65 / 1M$264.02104
3GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai71.111M tokens$0.08 / 1M$12.50184
4DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek68.651.05M tokens$0.15 / 1M$27.00193
5GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI67.09400K tokens$0.75 / 1M$165.00202
6GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI66.65400K tokens$0.20 / 1M$45.00212
7Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind65.78262.14K tokens$0.20 / 1M$28.00245
8Qwen3.7 PlusQwen65.071M tokens$0.32 / 1M$57.60234
9GLM 5.3Z.ai62.851M tokens$0.90 / 1M$170.00254
10Mistral Large 3Mistral AI55.84262.14K tokens$0.25 / 1M$40.00302
11Qwen3.7 MaxQwen54.611M tokens$1.48 / 1M$236.00Unknown4
12DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek53.871.05M tokens$0.22 / 1M$35.20Unknown3
13Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle DeepMind53.68262.14K tokens$0.07 / 1M$13.00384
14Qwen3.8 FlashQwen53.661M tokens$0.11 / 1M$18.94414
15Command ACohere53.25256K tokens$2.50 / 1M$450.00311
16Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind52.48131.07K tokens$0.02 / 1M$4.00Unknown2
17Qwen3.7 FlashQwen52.481M tokens$0.03 / 1M$5.60Unknown2
18GPT-5 NanoOpenAI52.48400K tokens$0.03 / 1M$6.50Unknown2
19GPT-5 MiniOpenAI52.38400K tokens$0.13 / 1M$32.50Unknown2
20Qwen3 Coder FlashQwen52.351M tokens$0.20 / 1M$39.00Unknown2

Fit scores are transparent screening aids, not universal quality claims. Unknown capability, context, or price fields are never filled by inference.

Inputs

What the Calculation Needs

3 input groups
InputHow it is used
Minimum contextContext needed for schema, instructions, examples, and source material.
Maximum input priceOptional per-million-token screening ceiling.
Tool callingWhether documented tool support is also required.

Methodology

The gate uses the canonical capability fields supplied by primary model or provider records. Ranking favors known context, provider breadth, benchmark coverage, and lower published price.

How to Interpret the Result

Documented support says the feature exists; it does not measure JSON validity on your schema. Run a schema-specific evaluation before production selection.

Boundaries

What the Result Does Not Prove

  1. Capability names can differ by provider endpoint.
  2. Strict-schema limits and unsupported keywords are not normalized here.
  3. Models with unknown support are excluded rather than assumed incapable.

Catalog values retain their source and freshness on the linked model, provider, benchmark, or comparison page. Editable scenario assumptions are not Model Markets measurements.

Continue the Analysis

Related Tools

All tools →
ToolNext question
Model SelectorTurn workload constraints into a short, inspectable model shortlist instead of a universal best-model claim.
Benchmark ComparisonInspect like-for-like published results without blending incompatible metrics or versions.
Prompt CostMake the cost of a system prompt, tool schema, or repeated instruction visible before scale.

Questions

Structured Outputs FAQs

What does the Structured Output Model Comparison calculate?+

Shortlist models for schema-constrained JSON and tool-integrated workflows. It returns eligible models ranked by documented support, context fit, provider coverage, benchmark rank, and price.

Does the Structured Output Model Comparison use current model data?+

Where the calculation needs model facts, it uses the current Model Markets catalog snapshot updated 2026-10-19. User-entered assumptions remain clearly editable, and unsupported values stay unknown rather than being inferred.

What should I verify before using the Structured Output Model Comparison result?+

Capability names can differ by provider endpoint. Strict-schema limits and unsupported keywords are not normalized here. Models with unknown support are excluded rather than assumed incapable. Open the linked canonical records and primary sources before making a production or purchasing decision.

Send Feedback