Long-Context Model Selector

Find models that clear a large context requirement while preserving price, output, and provider constraints.

Interactive Tool

Build a Scenario

Runs in your browser
Ranking priority
Changes weights, not the eligibility gate.
ResultValueHow to read it
Eligible models75Models that pass the selected evidence and constraint gates.
Ranked shortlist20Top candidates shown below.
Priced candidates66Models with both input and output price minima.
RankModelFit scoreContextInput / 1MWorkload costPublished benchmark rankProviders
1GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai55.451M tokens$0.08 / 1M$12.50Unknown4
2Qwen3.8 FlashQwen55.431M tokens$0.11 / 1M$18.94Unknown4
3Qwen3.7 PlusQwen55.281M tokens$0.32 / 1M$57.60Unknown4
4GLM 5.3Z.ai54.861M tokens$0.90 / 1M$170.00Unknown4
5Qwen3.7 MaxQwen54.611M tokens$1.48 / 1M$236.00Unknown4
6Qwen3.8 MaxQwen54.51M tokens$1.65 / 1M$264.02Unknown4
7DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek53.91.05M tokens$0.15 / 1M$27.00Unknown3
8DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek53.871.05M tokens$0.22 / 1M$35.20Unknown3
9Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic52.481M tokens$2.00 / 1M$400.00Unknown3
10Qwen3.7 FlashQwen52.481M tokens$0.03 / 1M$5.60Unknown2
11GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI52.471.05M tokens$0.05 / 1M$9.00Unknown2
12Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle DeepMind52.431.05M tokens$0.10 / 1M$18.00Unknown2
13GPT-6 LunaOpenAI52.421.05M tokens$0.10 / 1M$20.00Unknown2
14GPT-4.1 MiniOpenAI52.361.05M tokens$0.20 / 1M$36.00Unknown2
15GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI52.331.05M tokens$0.20 / 1M$44.00Unknown2
16Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle DeepMind52.291.05M tokens$0.25 / 1M$55.00Unknown2
17MiMo V2.6 ProXiaomi52.271.05M tokens$0.44 / 1M$60.90Unknown2
18Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind52.21.05M tokens$0.30 / 1M$80.00Unknown2
19Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle DeepMind52.21.05M tokens$0.30 / 1M$80.00Unknown2
20Gemini 3 FlashGoogle DeepMind52.081.05M tokens$0.50 / 1M$110.00Unknown2

Fit scores are transparent screening aids, not universal quality claims. Unknown capability, context, or price fields are never filled by inference.

Inputs

What the Calculation Needs

3 input groups
InputHow it is used
Required contextFull input, output, overhead, and safety envelope.
Minimum outputResponse capacity required after the prompt fits.
Maximum input priceOptional screening ceiling for long-context input.

Methodology

Unknown context limits fail closed. Passing models receive a headroom ratio and are ranked using the selected priority plus sourced price and provider breadth.

How to Interpret the Result

Large nominal windows can have different retrieval quality, latency, and provider limits. Test the full workload, not only whether it fits numerically.

Boundaries

What the Result Does Not Prove

  1. Provider endpoints can expose less context than the base model.
  2. Long prompts can produce nonlinear latency and cost.
  3. Context capacity is not evidence of long-context recall quality.

Catalog values retain their source and freshness on the linked model, provider, benchmark, or comparison page. Editable scenario assumptions are not Model Markets measurements.

Continue the Analysis

Related Tools

All tools →
ToolNext question
Context WindowTurn a nominal context-window number into a practical fit check for a complete request envelope.
Model SelectorTurn workload constraints into a short, inspectable model shortlist instead of a universal best-model claim.
Token CounterGet a fast planning estimate before sending a prompt or document to a tokenizer-backed API.

Questions

Long-Context Models FAQs

What does the Long-Context Model Selector calculate?+

Filter the catalog by usable request-envelope requirements before comparing cost or benchmark rank. It returns passing models ordered by context headroom, output capacity, price, and provider coverage.

Does the Long-Context Model Selector use current model data?+

Where the calculation needs model facts, it uses the current Model Markets catalog snapshot updated 2026-10-19. User-entered assumptions remain clearly editable, and unsupported values stay unknown rather than being inferred.

What should I verify before using the Long-Context Model Selector result?+

Provider endpoints can expose less context than the base model. Long prompts can produce nonlinear latency and cost. Context capacity is not evidence of long-context recall quality. Open the linked canonical records and primary sources before making a production or purchasing decision.

Send Feedback