NEO1X source ↗Robot Comparison · Interactive
NEO vs X30
A symmetrical comparison using normalized manufacturer-reported specifications. Green highlights mark the stronger value only where the specification has a defensible direction.
NEO1X source ↗
X30DEEP Robotics source ↗Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Specifications
| Field | NEO | X30 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | 1X | DEEP Robotics |
| Version | Home Robot | Unknown |
| Form factor | Humanoid | Quadruped |
| Availability | Select customers | Commercially available |
| Primary use | Home assistance | Industrial inspection and emergency operations |
| Starting price | Unknown | Unknown |
| Price qualifier | $200 deposit; full purchase price not represented | Contact sales |
| Height (m) | 1.6764 | 0.47 |
| Weight (kg) | 29.937 | 56 |
| Payload (kg) | 8.165 | Unknown |
| Runtime (hours) | 4 | 2.5 |
| Maximum speed (m/s) | 1.4 | 4 |
| Degrees of freedom | 75 | 12 |
| Reach (m) | Unknown | Unknown |
| Battery | 842 Wh; manufacturer states six minutes of charging per hour of runtime | Replaceable battery; manufacturer states approximately 2.5 to 4 hours |
| Sensors | dual 8.85 MP 90 Hz stereo fisheye cameras, four beamforming microphones, linkwise IMUs | 360-degree perception, LiDAR, depth cameras, optional inspection payloads |
| Onboard compute | 1X NEO Cortex using NVIDIA Jetson Thor; up to 2,070 FP4 TFLOPS claimed | Industrial autonomy computer |
| Software | Redwood AI, NEO mobile app | autonomous navigation, inspection mission software |
| Safety | soft body, covered pinch points, low-inertia tendon drive, IP44 body, IP68 hands | IP67 enclosure, operation from -20 to 55 degrees Celsius, automatic recovery |
| Control modes | autonomous, scheduled expert supervision, mobile app remote control, VR remote control | autonomous missions, remote control |
| Target applications | household chores, home assistance, companion functions | power inspection, emergency rescue, industrial inspection, security patrol |
17 comparable fields · 17 material differences · Interactive comparison only; editorial indexing gate not met
NEO Positioning
X30 Positioning
Primary Evidence
Manufacturer Sources and Freshness
Browse every robotics model, robot platform, and curated comparison →
Questions
NEO vs X30 FAQs
Which is better, NEO or X30?+
There is no defensible overall robot winner without a target task and environment. Compare form factor, availability, payload, runtime, speed, sensing, control, safety, and price; green highlights apply only to specifications with an explicit direction.
Which can carry more, NEO or X30?+
A direct answer is unavailable because X30 does not publish a normalized payload (kg) in the current source.
Which runs longer, NEO or X30?+
NEO leads this specification: NEO is 4 hours and X30 is 2.5 hours.
Which is faster, NEO or X30?+
X30 leads this specification: NEO is 1.4 m/s and X30 is 4 m/s.
Which costs less, NEO or X30?+
A normalized price comparison is unavailable. NEO: $200 deposit; full purchase price not represented. X30: Contact sales.
Can I buy NEO or X30 today?+
NEO is recorded as select customers (The manufacturer accepts a refundable deposit for early access; the deposit is not represented as the robot price.); X30 is commercially available (DEEP Robotics accepts commercial inquiries for X30 deployments.). Availability can be regional or customer-specific.
What are NEO and X30 designed to do?+
NEO: Home assistance. X30: Industrial inspection and emergency operations.
What sensors do NEO and X30 use?+
NEO: dual 8.85 MP 90 Hz stereo fisheye cameras, four beamforming microphones, linkwise IMUs. X30: 360-degree perception, LiDAR, depth cameras, optional inspection payloads.
What software and control options do NEO and X30 support?+
NEO: Redwood AI, NEO mobile app. X30: autonomous navigation, inspection mission software. NEO: autonomous, scheduled expert supervision, mobile app remote control, VR remote control. X30: autonomous missions, remote control.
Are NEO and X30 the same type of robot?+
No. NEO is a humanoid platform; X30 is a quadruped platform. Direct specification comparisons may therefore reflect different jobs.