Robot comparison · interactive

NEO vs SO-101

A symmetrical comparison using normalized manufacturer-reported specifications. Green highlights mark the stronger value only where the specification has a defensible direction.

FieldAt a glance
1X · Select customersNEOHumanoid · verified Aug 28, 2026
Hugging Face LeRobot · Open buildSO-101Fixed manipulator · verified Aug 28, 2026
Cross-category comparisonThese platforms do not share a sourced form factor, use case, or editorial comparison rationale, but their normalized specifications remain available below.

Technical differences

Side-by-side specifications

Interactive only
FieldNEOSO-101
Manufacturer1XHugging Face LeRobot
VersionHome RobotSO-101
Form factorHumanoidFixed manipulator
AvailabilitySelect customersOpen build
Primary useHome assistanceRobotics research, data collection, and policy evaluation
Starting priceUnknownUnknown
Price qualifier$200 deposit; full purchase price not representedBill-of-materials cost varies
Height (m)1.6764Unknown
Weight (kg)29.937Unknown
Payload (kg)8.165Unknown
Runtime (hours)4Unknown
Maximum speed (m/s)1.4Unknown
Degrees of freedom756
Reach (m)UnknownUnknown
Battery842 Wh; manufacturer states six minutes of charging per hour of runtimeExternal power; configuration depends on sourced motors
Sensorsdual 8.85 MP 90 Hz stereo fisheye cameras, four beamforming microphones, linkwise IMUsuser-configured cameras, joint position feedback
Onboard compute1X NEO Cortex using NVIDIA Jetson Thor; up to 2,070 FP4 TFLOPS claimedHost computer supplied by the builder
SoftwareRedwood AI, NEO mobile appHugging Face LeRobot, Feetech SDK
Safetysoft body, covered pinch points, low-inertia tendon drive, IP44 body, IP68 handsconfigurable maximum relative joint target
Control modesautonomous, scheduled expert supervision, mobile app remote control, VR remote controlleader-arm teleoperation, learned policy
Target applicationshousehold chores, home assistance, companion functionsimitation learning, VLA evaluation, robotics education

14 comparable fields · 14 material differences · Interactive comparison only; editorial indexing gate not met

NEO positioning

Primary useHome assistance
AvailabilitySelect customers
Starting price$200 deposit; full purchase price not represented
Canonical ID1x/neo

SO-101 positioning

Primary useRobotics research, data collection, and policy evaluation
AvailabilityOpen build
Starting priceBill-of-materials cost varies
Canonical IDlerobot/so-101

Primary evidence

Manufacturer sources and freshness

Browse every robotics model, robot platform, and curated comparison →

Send feedback